Biden is the change candidate in the US elections
Markets are still working through the Covid-19 outbreak and the economic recession, but the November US presidential election will gradually start to capture more attention. At this point, Democrat hopeful Joe Biden is the favourite to win with a clean sweep of the houses of congress, but it is too early to take a firm view and future events could dislodge current expectations.
However, we can analyse policy differences and their implications for investors. While Donald Trump will be a continuation of the status quo, it is Joe Biden who threatens to shake things up. We expect the key policy differences to be taxation, regulation and climate change while the stance on China is likely to remain on its current course.
Biden is the clear favourite at this point
Note: A = adults, RV = registered voters, LV = likely voters. Poll results released 15 July 2020. Source: Real Clear Politics, FiveThirtyEight, July 2020.
Some clear areas of policy distinction
Most US presidents elected to second terms tend to be less successful than they were in their first terms, or so the ‘second-term curse’ states. Whether true or not, scandal, policy inertia, economic crises or some sort of catastrophe have a habit of blighting second terms: for Clinton it was impeachment, for Bush Junior it was the Global Financial Crisis and for Obama it was the 2013 Federal government shutdown and criticism over the handling of a domestic outbreak of the Ebola virus. For President Donald Trump, who has faced a variation of all these issues already, there may be little scope for the curse to rear its head if he is elected to a second term.
But curses aren’t useful for analytical study. What’s more helpful is breaking down the impact of policies. We know what Trump’s core policies are - lower taxation, deregulation, increasing defence spending and taking a hard line with China - and he’s pursued these with gusto. So much so that there’s limited capacity for these policies to evolve substantially from here.
Instead, it is Biden, historically a middle-of-the-road democrat, that will be the ‘change candidate’, offering mainstream policies but with an unmistakable tilt to the left - mainly due to the Democratic party drifting away from the centre over the past four years. While more detail around Biden’s policies will emerge as the election draws nearer, there are some clear areas of policy distinction between the candidates.
Taxation divides the candidates
One of Trump’s major policy wins at the outset of his presidency was reducing taxes. He’s been content to leave them as they are since then, but a key objective for Biden will be to reverse some of them. If Biden wins, we expect he will push to raise corporate taxes from 21% to possibly 28%. That would be negative for US equities as corporate earnings fall, but the tax rate would still be lower than the 35% Trump inherited.
Even if corporate tax rises under a Biden government, they will still be near multi-decade lows
Source: Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, July 2020.
Biden has also proposed to double the global minimum tax on offshore profits from 10.5% to 21%. This will hurt global companies with low tax rates especially those in technology and healthcare who have repatriated cash to distribute to shareholders and to fund acquisitions.
Biden’s ‘Green New Deal’
Trump has been vocal on his distrust of climate change science and has cut green regulations and funding for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of Energy, which oversee climate change policy. A Biden presidency will seek to launch a large-scale green investment plan.
Biden has proposed a far-reaching $2 trillion spending programme over four years to boost the use of clean energy in the transportation, electricity and building sectors, partly designed to create economic growth and develop infrastructure. The proposal will most obviously benefit renewable energy, construction and certain industrial companies, while the fossil fuels industry will lose out.
If enacted, Biden’s green plan will be a boon to job creation in a number of sectors. Biden may also seek to implement new rules around labour to combat social inequality. These could include a minimum wage, labour union-friendly regulations and granting some degree of employment status to ‘gig’ economy workers. This could spur wage and goods inflation.
China policy is unlikely to change
The US has a bi-partisan, hawkish view of China so we are likely to continue seeing confrontation between the two powers. As the geopolitical rivalry evolves during the next presidential term, other countries will face increasing pressure to pick a side and political pundits may start discussing a bipolar world. Tariffs are likely to remain, and companies will continue to realign supply chains. This could cause inflationary pressure over the coming years.
One point of difference will be how the US government shapes the restructuring of supply chains. Trump is outspoken in favouring the onshoring of manufacturing while Biden may be less opposed to supply chains moving to friendly countries. This could be to the advantage of Mexico, which has low labour costs and established supply links with the US, solidified under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
Tech regulation is a matter of time
The momentum behind regulating technology companies is not slowing down, and both candidates are likely to pursue it. Regulation can be defined in two broad ways; domestic regulation to manage content and privacy, and external regulation for security reasons.
Domestic regulation would be aimed at limiting harmful content, protecting user privacy, data portability and blocking fake news around elections. Promoting competition may be another goal but its benefits are less clear. External regulation could result in Huawei being banned from the US and potentially other Chinese tech firms. Local tech companies in competition with Huawei, such as Cisco, could capture more market share as a result.
Drug pricing in the cross hairs
Healthcare costs per capita in the US are the highest in the OECD and cutting its cost as a proportion of GDP may have to be an aim of the whoever forms the next administration. The easiest path to do this is by reducing the growth in healthcare costs to below inflation to gradually decrease its budgetary importance.
Both nominees have targeted drug prices, but it’s a more overt policy for Biden. Medicare could be allowed to negotiate prices centrally to push for better deals - something other countries do including the UK. Reviewing the healthcare system to reduce the use of hospitals in favour of more home and outpatient care, and the use of ‘telehealth’ as a genuine alternative may also help ease the cost. The impact of all this on healthcare companies will not be uniform, with winners and losers across the healthcare chain. However, pharmaceutical companies are likely to come under pressure should drug prices fall, while medical technology firms should gain as new, cost-effective treatments are sought out.
US healthcare costs may have to come down
Source: OECD, July 2020.
Time to think about positioning
While Biden is the clear favourite to win the presidency at this stage, it is still too early to take a firm view on the result. A lot can happen in the four months between now and the election. We are still working through a resurgent pandemic and economic turmoil, and we can’t rule out major geopolitical events or political plot twists from two gaff-prone candidates. Over time, more policy information will emerge as well as clarity over the various permutations of control over congress. Both will be key to understanding what the next US presidential term will have in store for investors.
As a fund manager investing in long-term structural growth opportunities, a Biden win could trigger powerful trends that will span the decade. These new trends could unlock investment prospects outside the traditional technology sectors in areas including automation, manufacturing, supply chains and construction. Even if Biden fails to win, there could be other opportunities from tech regulation, onshoring industrial activities and changes to the health care system. It’s a good time for investors to start developing their theses and preparing to position themselves for the coming election developments.
* Refences made to dollars are US dollars unless otherwise stated.
This document is issued by FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009, AFSL No. 409340 (“Fidelity Australia”). Fidelity Australia is a member of the FIL Limited group of companies commonly known as Fidelity International.
Investments in overseas markets can be affected by currency exchange and this may affect the value of your investment. Investments in small and emerging markets can be more volatile than investments in developed markets.
This document is intended for use by advisers and wholesale investors. Retail investors should not rely on any information in this document without first seeking advice from their financial adviser. This document has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider these matters before acting on the information. You should also consider the relevant Product Disclosure Statements (“PDS”) for any Fidelity Australia product mentioned in this document before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. The PDS can be obtained by contacting Fidelity Australia on 1800 119 270 or by downloading it from our website at www.fidelity.com.au. This document may include general commentary on market activity, sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions that should not be taken as investment advice. Information stated herein about specific securities is subject to change. Any reference to specific securities should not be taken as a recommendation to buy, sell or hold these securities. While the information contained in this document has been prepared with reasonable care, no responsibility or liability is accepted for any errors or omissions or misstatements however caused. This document is intended as general information only. The document may not be reproduced or transmitted without prior written permission of Fidelity Australia. The issuer of Fidelity’s managed investment schemes is FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009. Reference to ($) are in Australian dollars unless stated otherwise.
© 2020 FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited. Fidelity, Fidelity International and the Fidelity International logo and F symbol are trademarks of FIL Limited.