Fidelity International
 

Imagine a coin is flipped 20 times and heads comes up every time. You’re given a large sum of money to bet on the next flip. What would you call?  

Many of us would call tails on the basis that it seems ‘due’. After all, if a coin is flipped 21 times, then the probability of 21 heads is 1 in 2,097,152. Intuitively, we know that such streaks have low and declining probability. Critically, however, this has no bearing on the next flip of the coin. The coin, much like the roulette wheel that has had a run of red numbers, has no memory. The probability of flipping a head after 20 heads in a row is the same as always: 1/2. 

The flawed thinking that draws many of us to tails is known as the gambler’s fallacy. The mistake is to expect to see what happens over a much larger (or infinite) sample of flips to be represented at a much smaller sample size. For instance, the sequence H-T-H-T-T-H would be considered more likely by many people than H-H-H-T-T-T, simply because it seems more random, or more representative of a random process. 

The gambler’s fallacy is just one example of a broader cognitive trap known as representativeness. It describes our willingness to judge events by how they appear rather than by how likely they are actually according to the rules of probability. We use stereotypes, individualising or unrepresentative information at the expense of more accurate, yet complex calculations that we think are the sole realm of the statistician. The latter require careful thinking by the rational, calculating part of our brains and the evidence from behavioural surveys is that we much prefer jumping to conclusions than carrying out the math. 

The different way our minds treat readily available information and information that is unknown or hard to get is described by behavioural psychologist Daniel Kahneman in the acronym WYSIATI or “What You See Is All There Is”. In short, we jump to conclusions based on limited data – much of the time, the coherent story we put together in our heads is close enough to reality, enabling us to think fast in a complex world. But, other times the shortcuts we make lead us astray. 

This is a particular issue for investors who are faced with forming judgements about an uncertain future, based on how things appear now. Our judgements often depend on the coherence of a story that seems compelling to us, rather than the quality or the completeness of the data on which it is based, and the changes that can occur in that data.

Quite often, representativeness shortcuts work because there is truth in stereotypes. However, we need to be aware that these shortcuts are fallible – particularly when they cause us to neglect base rate information that points to a different conclusion. 
 

This document is issued by FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009, AFSL No. 409340 (“Fidelity Australia”).  Fidelity Australia is a member of the FIL Limited group of companies commonly known as Fidelity International.

Investments in overseas markets can be affected by currency exchange and this may affect the value of your investment. Investments in small and emerging markets can be more volatile than investments in developed markets.

This document is intended for use by advisers and wholesale investors. Retail investors should not rely on any information in this document without first seeking advice from their financial adviser. This document has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider these matters before acting on the information.  You should also consider the relevant Product Disclosure Statements (“PDS”) for any Fidelity Australia product mentioned in this document before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. The PDS can be obtained by contacting Fidelity Australia on 1800 119 270 or by downloading it from our website at www.fidelity.com.au. This document may include general commentary on market activity, sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions that should not be taken as investment advice. Information stated herein about specific securities is subject to change. Any reference to specific securities should not be taken as a recommendation to buy, sell or hold these securities. While the information contained in this document has been prepared with reasonable care, no responsibility or liability is accepted for any errors or omissions or misstatements however caused. This document is intended as general information only. The document may not be reproduced or transmitted without prior written permission of Fidelity Australia. The issuer of Fidelity’s managed investment schemes is FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009. Reference to ($) are in Australian dollars unless stated otherwise. 

© 2018 FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited. Fidelity, Fidelity International and the Fidelity International logo and F symbol are trademarks of FIL Limited.

Get Fidelity insights

Fidelity Insights is a free, monthly e-newsletter that brings you valuable and distilled investment insights, opinion and education.

Subscribe 

Latest insights from portfolio managers around the world
News and views on Australian markets & companies
Education and behavioural finance insights

Subscribe 

 

Related insights

Tools for your clients: Active vs passive
James Bateman

Tools for your clients: Active vs passive

There’s been a great deal of debate whether active or passive management is the right choice for investors but is this the right question to be asking?

How much is too much? (2 of 4)
Jeremy Podger

How much is too much? (2 of 4)

It’s not necessarily easy to assess whether the technology sector is overvalued. Can current market leaders continue to justify their value?

Along the continuum
Bill McQuaker Portfolio Manager, Eugene Philalithis Portfolio Manager and Vanessa Glennie Investment Writer

Along the continuum

Conditions change throughout an investment cycle, so how and when should investors combine the various shades of active and passive to maximise returns?

From the desk of Alex Duffy: A comment on portfolio construction
Alex Duffy

From the desk of Alex Duffy: A comment on portfolio construction

Portfolio construction all too often appears as an after-thought for many active managers yet it is ultimately critical in determining the investment returns and volatility of returns for investor in the underlying portfolio. 

View more insights