Brexit vote: A 'no-deal' beckons

UK Prime Minister Theresa May’s Brexit deal was defeated by 230 votes in the House of Commons. The defeat was more severe than expected and leaves May with three days to come up with a plan B. The political situation is still uncertain. Potential scenarios include extending Article 50, crashing out of the European Union with no deal, or both. Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn tabled a motion of no-confidence in the Government, expected to be debated in Parliament on Wednesday.

The UK Government was widely predicted to lose the vote, with some correctly expecting May to suffer the worst ever House of Commons defeat, surpassing Ramsay MacDonald’s 166-vote loss in 1924. Mrs May has indicated she will attempt to renegotiate with the EU. Discussions will need to be hurried -  she has only three working days to present a revised deal to the House and the scale of the defeat weakens her bargaining power.

The situation will become clearer after plan B is presented to parliament next week. If meaningful concessions are garnered from the EU, particularly on the Irish backstop, enough MPs might be persuaded to support the revised deal. But the scale of the defeat this evening makes this a distant possibility.

The clock is ticking on Article 50, which, if not extended, will see the UK leave the EU without a deal on March 29. There are still many possible scenarios following the vote including an extension to Article 50, a no-deal Brexit, a general election, or a second referendum.

Below are comments from Leigh Himsworth, equities portfolio manager:

“My own view (personal politics aside) is that the only reason Article 50 would be used is to go for a ‘No-deal’ outcome but allow greater preparation to take place. For instance, laws still need to be passed for a no-deal. Circa 1,000 statutory instruments are still needed in this scenario, for flights to pass over other territories, the insurance of vehicles, EU nationals to remain physically in place, the movement of livestock, etc. An extension of Article 50 with a ‘no-deal’ at the end of the maximum delay period - June 2nd - is, for me, now the most likely outcome.”

“Ultimately the debate is how we get to a full exit from the EU. This will either be a no-deal ‘crash-out’ or one that may happen over many years. Each has pros and cons. The ‘crash-out’ is potentially highly disruptive but gives certainty on what the UK faces and allows subsequent negotiation of trade deals, movement of people and so on. This could result in an immediate fall in sterling, but then a rebound as companies are forced to re-adjust quickly. The latter, an elongated exit, may result in a stronger sterling initially but prolong the uncertainty, resulting in falling investment and concerns about the ability of the corporate sector to make longer term plans.”
 FIL Limited.

This document is issued by FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009, AFSL No. 409340 (“Fidelity Australia”).  Fidelity Australia is a member of the FIL Limited group of companies commonly known as Fidelity International.

This document is intended for use by advisers and wholesale investors. Retail investors should not rely on any information in this document without first seeking advice from their financial adviser. This document is intended as general information only. Please remember past performance is not a guide to the future. Investors should also obtain and consider the Product Disclosure Statements ("PDS") for the fund(s) mentioned in this document before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. The PDS is available on www.fidelity.com.au or can be obtained by contacting Fidelity Australia on 1800 119 270. This document has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider such matters before acting on the information contained in this document. This document may include general commentary on market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions which should not be construed as investment advice. Information stated herein about specific securities is subject to change. Any reference to specific securities should not be construed as a recommendation to buy, sell or hold these securities. While the information contained in this document has been prepared with reasonable care, no responsibility or liability is accepted for any errors or omissions or misstatements however caused. The document may not be reproduced or transmitted without prior written permission of Fidelity Australia. The issuer of Fidelity's funds is FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009. References to ($) are in Australian dollars unless stated otherwise. Details of Fidelity Australia’s provision of financial services to retail clients are set out in our Financial Services Guide, a copy of which can be downloaded from our website.

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any comments or statements made are not necessarily those of Fidelity Australia. All e-mails sent from or to Fidelity Australia may be subject to our monitoring procedures. E-mail communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions which arise as a result.

© 2019 FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited. Fidelity, Fidelity International and the Fidelity International logo and F symbol are trademarks of FIL Limited.

Share:
 
 

Want more insights like this?

Get our free, monthly e-newsletter bringing you valuable insights, opinion and education.

Subscribe