Jeremy Podger
 

In the second of a series of four, Portfolio Manager, Jeremy Podger looks at the impact of technology stocks on global equities in recent times. He explains why it’s not necessarily straight forward to assess if the sector is overvalued and looks at whether the current market leaders can continue to justify their value.

With last year’s amazing performance of technology stocks, people have rightly asked whether this is an overvalued area. Here the answer is not straightforward. Technology cannot be narrowly defined, and now permeates every industrial sector to a greater or lesser extent. It is rare to see a single sector stand out to the extent that technology did last year. However, aggregate technology profits were also much stronger than for the market as a whole.

Thus the sector’s relative valuation based on forward earnings estimates barely shifted. If we want to ask whether this is an overvalued area, we need to find other angles to look at because - in sharp contrast to the state of affairs in the tech bubble of 1999/2000 - earnings-based valuations are not polarised compared to other sectors.

One of the key problems within technology is the concentration of market value in the biggest beasts within the sector (Facebook; Amazon; Netflix and Google (FANGs) and Baidu, Alibaba and Tencent (BAT). These companies all saw strong earnings growth and share price rises last year and thereby became far jmore significant weights within broad market indices. For these stocks it is probably best to test reasonableness on a case by case basis.
 

MSCI AC World vs MSCI ACWI Information Technology

Source: Fidelity International, Thomson Reuters Datastream, 31 March 2018. Indices rebased to 100 as at 1 January 1995. 

Past performance (%) March 13/14  March 14/15 March 15/16 March 16/17 March 17/18
MSCI AC World  6.2% 18.4% -1.2% 32.3% 2.4%
MSCI ACWI Information Technology  12.8% 30.2% 5.3% 43.6% 15.4%

 

For example, the market value of Alphabet (Google) and Facebook, both of which derive their revenue from and dominate digital advertising, is around US$1,200bn - which compares to an estimated total global advertising spend of around US$500bn. Amazon has a market value of around US$700bn. Walmart has far bigger sales and historically better margins but you pay around US$3.9 for a dollar of sales at Amazon and a little over 50 cents at Walmart.


We know it is fair to pay for growth - but we have to keep asking how much is fair to pay for it - can these companies justify their value in terms of the profits they will eventually earn when they are fully mature? It is worth observing that high growth companies often see sharp de-rating in their shares when their growth rate slows, even if they are still growing faster than the broad average.
 

This document is issued by FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009, AFSL No. 409340 (“Fidelity Australia”).  Fidelity Australia is a member of the FIL Limited group of companies commonly known as Fidelity International.

Investments in overseas markets can be affected by currency exchange and this may affect the value of your investment. Investments in small and emerging markets can be more volatile than investments in developed markets.

This document is intended for use by advisers and wholesale investors. Retail investors should not rely on any information in this document without first seeking advice from their financial adviser. This document has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider these matters before acting on the information.  You should also consider the relevant Product Disclosure Statements (“PDS”) for any Fidelity Australia product mentioned in this document before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. The PDS can be obtained by contacting Fidelity Australia on 1800 119 270 or by downloading it from our website at www.fidelity.com.au. This document may include general commentary on market activity, sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions that should not be taken as investment advice. Information stated herein about specific securities is subject to change. Any reference to specific securities should not be taken as a recommendation to buy, sell or hold these securities. While the information contained in this document has been prepared with reasonable care, no responsibility or liability is accepted for any errors or omissions or misstatements however caused. This document is intended as general information only. The document may not be reproduced or transmitted without prior written permission of Fidelity Australia. The issuer of Fidelity’s managed investment schemes is FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009. Reference to ($) are in Australian dollars unless stated otherwise. 

© 2018 FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited. Fidelity, Fidelity International and the Fidelity International logo and F symbol are trademarks of FIL Limited.

Get Fidelity insights

Fidelity Insights is a free, monthly e-newsletter that brings you valuable and distilled investment insights, opinion and education.

Subscribe 

Latest insights from portfolio managers around the world
News and views on Australian markets & companies
Education and behavioural finance insights

Subscribe 

 

Related insights

Tools for your clients: Active vs passive
James Bateman

Tools for your clients: Active vs passive

There’s been a great deal of debate whether active or passive management is the right choice for investors but is this the right question to be asking?

Behavioural finance: When what you see is all there is
Fidelity International

Behavioural finance: When what you see is all there is

Forming conclusions based on limited data helps us to process things quickly in a complex world however these shortcuts can lead us astray… 

Along the continuum
Bill McQuaker Portfolio Manager, Eugene Philalithis Portfolio Manager and Vanessa Glennie Investment Writer

Along the continuum

Conditions change throughout an investment cycle, so how and when should investors combine the various shades of active and passive to maximise returns?

From the desk of Alex Duffy: A comment on portfolio construction
Alex Duffy

From the desk of Alex Duffy: A comment on portfolio construction

Portfolio construction all too often appears as an after-thought for many active managers yet it is ultimately critical in determining the investment returns and volatility of returns for investor in the underlying portfolio. 

View more insights