When things are so bad, they're actually good
When people start to talk in terms of a ‘national emergency’, as the CBI and TUC did in a joint letter to the Prime Minister, contrarian investors’ antennae start twitching. Rightly so. The three-day week, the miners’ strike, the ERM crisis, Northern Rock. These were all good times to invest in the UK stock market. So, I’m inclined to think that our current political humiliation may be just the latest example of things being so bad they are actually good.
I hesitate to comment on the Brexit drama if there will be a delay of more than a few hours between my writing the words and anyone reading them. Never in the history of human punditry has so much commentary been overtaken by events so quickly. But if anything is clearer after Theresa May’s visit to Brussels last week, it is that a no-deal exit is looking less likely. How things pan out in the end is unclear, but the stock market’s sang froid since Christmas is starting to look prescient.
Whatever your personal view of how the cards should fall over the next few weeks, there is little question that the softer the Brexit the warmer the financial market reaction will be. This is most clear in the currency market. But the stock market also has an unsurprising preference for the less economically damaging options.
The UK market’s concerns about Brexit have been disguised in the three years since the referendum. Partly that’s due to the international nature of the FTSE 100, which earns most of its profits overseas and pays its dividends in large part out of dollar earnings. In sterling terms, it looks like we’ve gone sideways. To see the full extent of the damage to sentiment, however, you need to look at the performance of London-listed shares from the perspective of an investor in New York, Singapore or Tokyo. In dollar terms, the FTSE 100 has underperformed the rest of the world by about 20pc over the past three years.
Overseas investors have rarely been as out of love with the UK market as they are today. The latest Merrill Lynch fund manager survey, published last week, confirmed that the UK is the most unpopular destination for investors at the moment. This is not unreasonable when you consider that UK shares only represent about 6pc of the total value of global stock markets. For investors beyond our shores, the effort of trying to understand Brexit, let alone the civil war in Westminster, has just not been worth it.
It would be easy to blame our pariah status completely on Brexit but that would be wrong. It is actually a symptom of a wider aversion to uncertainty and volatility that has been in evidence ever since the financial crisis. The 2008 shock was a deeply traumatic event for investors and their attempts to avoid a repetition of the pain it caused are still shaping markets a decade later.
Over the past 10 years, investors have been prepared to pay a significant premium for predictability. They have shunned uncertainty wherever they find it. Brexit Britain is the most high-profile example, but it is not the only one. The volatility and cheap valuations of shares in China, for example, are a consequence of investors’ unwillingness to believe the economic data. An unclear outlook also explains why Japan and Europe have been so out of favour. Faced with uncertainty, investors have preferred to pay a higher price for the apparent transparency of the US and the perceived steady and reliable growth of, for example, the FAANGs.
This fear of uncertainty and volatility is also evident in the growing preference for illiquid asset classes like private equity, infrastructure and real estate. It is not just that steady income streams have made these investments more predictable for investors, the absence of a minute-by-minute price-setting market for these assets has protected investors from the gyrations that make stock market investing so stressful. We cannot bear too much reality.
Aversion to uncertainty also goes some way to explaining why value has been such a poor indicator of future returns in recent years. In less traumatised markets you might expect investors to gravitate towards apparently cheap investments on the grounds that over time everything eventually reverts to the mean. In fact, the reverse has been the case. Growth and quality have consistently outperformed value, as investors have become curiously price-insensitive.
The result of all this has been that the markets with the least visibility have become the least expensive. The UK is now cheaper, whatever your preferred measure might be, than Europe, Japan, emerging markets or the US. Whether you look at the multiple of expected earnings you are required to pay for UK shares, or the income with which they reward your patience, our market is in the bargain basement. And the closer you get to home the bigger the discount. Domestic, smaller companies have consistently underperformed the larger, international-facing FTSE 100 stocks.
This may persist, but investors should consider the possibility that the expensive growth and quality stocks turns out to be less predictable than the market expects. Regulation and more intrusive tax authorities might reduce the already diminished appeal of the big US tech stocks. Equally, the fog of uncertainty clouding the outlook in Britain could clear surprisingly quickly.
A willingness to overpay for certainty has served investors well over the past ten years. It is not a given that it will continue to do so. As the hand-wringing and self-doubt intensifies, home bias has never looked more sensible.
This document is issued by FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009, AFSL No. 409340 (“Fidelity Australia”). Fidelity Australia is a member of the FIL Limited group of companies commonly known as Fidelity International.
This document is intended for use by advisers and wholesale investors. Retail investors should not rely on any information in this document without first seeking advice from their financial adviser. This document has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider these matters before acting on the information. You should also consider the relevant Product Disclosure Statements (“PDS”) for any Fidelity Australia product mentioned in this document before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. The PDS can be obtained by contacting Fidelity Australia on 1800 119 270 or by downloading it from our website at www.fidelity.com.au. This document may include general commentary on market activity, sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions that should not be taken as investment advice. Information stated herein about specific securities is subject to change. Any reference to specific securities should not be taken as a recommendation to buy, sell or hold these securities. While the information contained in this document has been prepared with reasonable care, no responsibility or liability is accepted for any errors or omissions or misstatements however caused. This material contains statements that are "forward-looking statements", which are based on certain assumptions of future events. Actual events may differ from those assumed. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements, including any projected returns, will materialise or that actual market conditions and/or performance results will not be materially different or worse than those presented. This document is intended as general information only. The document may not be reproduced or transmitted without prior written permission of Fidelity Australia. The issuer of Fidelity’s managed investment schemes is FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009.
© 2019 FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited. Fidelity, Fidelity International and the Fidelity International logo and F symbol are trademarks of FIL Limited.